DA COMPULSIVIDADE DO DESPEJO
1. Habituados a dar pretextos aos Israelistas, os especialistas em martírio do Hamas continuam a não dar descanso à sua população, ao ponto de termos de pensar se o Hamas visa uma independência e uma nacionalidade afirmada e reconhecida internacionalmente ou apenas o módico prémio da destruição de Israel, sendo cada suicidário o lento e frustre agente de tal plano. O certo é que a artilharia israelita faz agora o bombardeamento na zona Este da Faixa de Gaza e consta que o exército de Israel Tzahal גלי צה"ל já tinha rodeado todo o perímetro de Gaza e que vários palestinianos testemunharam explosões na cidade, segundo informa a Reuters. Após uma semana em que o território controlado pelo Hamas sofreu raides continuados da aviação israelita, vitimando pelo menos 433 palestinianos, espera-se que o exército de Israel invada e ocupe Gaza. Os telefonemas israelitas preventivos para os habitantes dos alvos, é um dos sinais do redesenho territorial da região. Será uma questão de tempo.
lkj
2. Talvez seja a hora de perder as ilusões pacifistas e optimistas que nos têm alienado a nós, Ocidente, quando confrontados com o valor político do Gás, da Água e do Petróleo, senão basta olharmos para a falta de entendimento entre a Rússia e a Ucrânia em relação ao gás natural o que se arrisca a trazer “problemas muito graves” para a Europa “dentro de dez dias”, segundo alarma e alerta hoje o representante da presidência ucraniana para a segurança energética, Bogdan Sokolovski. “Se a parte russa não libertar mais gás do que na situação actual, dentro de dez dias podem registar-se problemas tecnológicos muito graves” relativamente ao trânsito do gás russo para a Europa, disse Sokolovski. Nada mais que uma forma moderna e subtil de chantagem e de repolarizar as questõesmais vitais. De chantagem em chantagem, porém, até que tudo tal como hoje o conhecemos e reconhecemos e nem parece precário rua como um castelo de cartas.
lkj
3. Reparem como nos tranquiliza o presidente dos Comboios de Portugal (CP) ao recusar hoje as acusações de actos ilegais de gestão feitas por quadros técnicos da empresa e ao assegurar que tem elementos para rebater, ponto por ponto, cada uma das denúncias. A não ser que o semanário Sol se tenha especializado em Bluffs, o certo é que noticiou hoje que a Inspecção-Geral de Obras Públicas estava a investigar a CP na sequência de uma denúncia apresentada por funcionários da empresa que, numa carta anónima, relatam "um conjunto de situações graves e de actos ilegais de gestão". Eu, por mim, prefiro acreditar na denúncia dos funcionários. Ela permite explicar o prejuízo continuado e arrastado da CP ao longo de todo o período de democracia pós-aprilina. Há certamente aqui alguém a precisar da compulsividade do despejo.
Comments
In the 19th century the land of Palestine was inhabited by a multicultural population – approximately 86 percent Muslim, 10 percent Christian, and 4 percentJewish – living in peace.
In the late 1800s a group in Europe decided to colonize this land. Known as Zionists, this group consisted of an extremist minorityof the Jewish population. They wanted to createa Jewish homeland, and considered locationsin Africa and the Americas, before settling on Palestine. At first, this immigration created no problems. However, as more and more Zionists immigrated to Palestine – many with the express wish of taking over the land for a Jewish state – the indigenous population became increasingly alarmed. Eventually, fighting broke out, with escalating waves of violence. Hitler’s rise to power and Nazi atrocities, combined with Zionist activities to sabotage efforts to place Jewish refugees in western countries, led to increased Jewish immigration to Palestine, and conflict grew.
In 1947 the United Nations decided to intervene. However, rather than adhering to the democratic principle espoused decades earlier by Woodrow Wilson of “self-determination of peoples,” in which the people themselves create their own state and system of government, the UN chose to revert to the medieval strategy whereby an outside power divides up other people’s land. Under considerable Zionist pressure, the UN recommended giving away 55 percent of Palestine to a Jewish state – despite the fact that this group represented only about 30 percent of the total population, and owned under 7 percent of the land.
While it is widely and correctly reported that the resulting war eventually included five Arab armies, less well known is the fact that throughout this war Zionist forces out numbered all Arab and Palestinian combatants combined – often by a factor of two to three. Also contrary to popular belief, Arab armies did not invade Israel – virtually all battles were fought on land that was to have been the Palestinian state. Finally, it is significant to note that Arab armies entered the conflict only after Zionistf orces had committed 16 massacres, including the grisly massacre of over 100 men, women,and children at Deir Yassin. Future Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin, head of one of the Jewish terrorist groups, called this a “splendid act of conquest,” and stated: “As inDeir Yassin, so everywhere, we will attack and smite the enemy. God, God, Thou has chosenus for conquest.” Zionist/Israeli forces committed33 massacres altogether. By the end of the war, Israel had conquered 78 percent of Palestine; three-quarters of a million Palestinians had been made refugees; over500 towns and villages had been destroyed; and a new map was drawn up, in which every city, river and hillock received a new, Hebrew name, as all vestiges of the Palestinian culture were to be erased. For many decades Israel denied the existence of this population, former Israeli PrimeMinister Golda Meir once saying: “There is no such thing as a Palestinian.”
Then in 1967, Israel conquered still more land.Following the Six Day War, in which Israeli forces launched a highly successful surprise attack on Egypt, Israel occupied the additional 22 percent of Palestine that had eluded it in 1948 – the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Since, according to international law it is in admissibleto acquire territory by war, these are occupied territories and do not belong to Israel. It also occupied parts of Egypt (since returned)and Syria (which remain under occupation). Also during the Six-Day War, Israel attacked a US Navy ship, the USS Liberty, killing and injuring over 200 American servicemen. President Lyndon Johnson recalled rescue flights, saying that he did not want to "embarrass an ally." (In 2004 a high-level commission chaired by Admiral Thomas Moorer, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, found this attack to be “an act of war against the UnitedStates,” a fact few news media have
reported).
There are two primary issues at the core of this continuing conflict. First, there is the inevitably destabilizing effect of trying to maintainan ethnically preferential state, particularly when it is largely of foreign origin – the original population of what is now Israel was 96 percent Muslim and Christian. Yet, Muslim andChristian refugees are prohibited from returningto their homes in the self-described Jewish state. (And those within Israel are subjected to systematic discrimination). Second, Israel’s continued military occupationand confiscation of privately owned land in the West Bank, and control over Gaza, are beingresisted by Palestinian inhabitants. It is these occupied territories that, according to the Oslo peace accords of 1993, were going to become a Palestinian state. However, when Israel continued to confiscate land in these areas and to move its citizens onto it, the Palestinian population rebelled. (The Barak offer, widely reputed to begenerous, was anything but). This uprising, called the “Intifada” (Arabic for “shaking off”) began in the fall of 2000.
Largely due to one-sided special-interestlobbying, U.S. taxpayers give Israel an average of $7 million per day, and since its creation have given more U.S. funds to Israel than to any other nation. As Americans learn about how Israel is using their tax dollars, many are calling for an end to this expenditure.
Synopsis from http://www.ifamericansknew.org/
For a more detailed history on the Palestine-Israel conflict, read "The Origin of the Palestine-Israel Conflict".